Weather radar signal processing techniques

Automatic Detection and Mitigation of Wind Turbine Clutter
using Radar Data Products

Example of performance of the level-II detection algorithm on real data from the KDDC radar in Dodge City, KS. Image courtesy of B. Cheong.

I collaborate with Drs. Boon Leng Cheong and Robert Palmer to study the capability of WSR-88D radars to identify the weather radar interference generated by wind farms using readily available radar products. This project is funded by the NWS Radar Operations Center (ROC).

We developed a fundamental framework for automatic wind turbine detection using Level II data, i.e., reflectivity, Doppler velocity, and spectrum width, which focuses on areas where ground clutter filter has been applied. The goal is to indentify the residual wind turbine clutter signals that pass though the ground clutter filter, i.e., CMD (Clutter Mitigation Decision) flag has been marked. The fundamental idea is to mimic human’s visual identification capability to lock on stationary features when several consecutive images are inspected in a loop manner. The algorithm utilizes a series of consecutive radar images to derive six texture maps, which are essentially spatio-temporal statistical quantities for features on the radar images. The textures are subsequently ingested into a fuzzy-logic inference system for wind turbine clutter detection. The platform has been implemented and preliminary tests have been conducted with datasets from Dodge City, Kansas (KDDC), Dyess Air Force Base, Texas (KDYX) and Buffalo, New York (KBUF). Initial investigation has shown potentials in identifying wind farm regions with a window of 7-9 radar scans, which represent a time span of 35 to 45 minutes when the radar is operated at precipitation mode. A more thorough evaluation on the potentials of this platform is currently being finalized by the Radar Operations Center's Applications Branch.

The image on the left shows standard moments (left column) and six textures being derived in the algorithm (meddle and right columns). Also, the output of the fuzzy-logic detector is shown in the bottom panel, where the output is a value between 0 and 1 indicating certain degree of confidence. Yellow shades indicate detections (values > 0.5) of wind turbine clutter. Two wind farms, one located 40 km southwest while the other lies 25 km northeast of the KDDC radar site were successfully identified. Note the similar values in reflectivity, velocity and spectrum width for the precipitation at the southwestern region that would be nearly impossible to identify without a temporal history of data. The algorithm was able to separate the wind turbine clutter from the radar signals by using six temporal-spatial textures.

The most recent results are documented in this paper presented at the 2011 IEEE Radar Conference.

Back to WTC

What's new?

ARRC team receives second NSF award to investigate tonado debris

We recently received a second award from the National Science Foundation (NSF) for our research project "Understanding the Relationship Between Tornadoes and Debris Through Observed and Simulated Radar Data."

Read more

NEXRAD class at the Osher Lifelong Learning Institute

This fall, I had the honor and privilege to teach an OLLI class with my friend and colleague Jami Boettcher. "NEXRAD Weather Radar: How it Works and What Those Images Tell Us" kept us busy for 5 weeks this fall.

Read more

Paper makes the cover of IEEE journal

Our paper "Bootstrap Dual-Polarimetric Spectral Density Estimator" made the cover of the April 2017 issue of the IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing journal.

Read more

JTECH Associate Editor

I have accepted to serve as an associate editor for the American Meteorological Society’s Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology.

Read more

Outstanding Service Award

I have been chosen as the winner of the 2016 OU College of Atmospheric and Geographic Sciences Dean’s Award for Outstanding Service.

Read more

[News archive]